Kant Essay -- essays research papers

Utilitarianism is a consequential perspective, in that, a decision in based on the effects it ---- breath have on society and what it will gener in ally lead to. Also, the utility or usefulness of an fulfill is contumacious by the amount of happiness that will result. Therefore, no displaceion in itself groundwork be deemed wrong consequence alone are the essential matter. Using this principle, one should consider the possible results of each potential action. matchless clear flaw of the utilitarian perspective is there that there seems to be a lack of the concept of justice. Their moral principles would justify doing experiments on a single macrocosm with no friends or family. The justification would still personify in a case in which the experiments would cause a man to die, yet benefits occurred because substantial medical knowledge was obtained. There also seems to be no intrinsic take to be placed upon human life, yet the value is placed upon the happiness of the great est of people.Utilitarianism follows one of two categories act and regulation. With toy Utilitarianism, all possible actions are considered and one must determine which action would yield the most happiness or benefits for the greatest number of people. However, with act utilitarianism, there really is no way of muster up if the right survival of actions was carried out. Also, there is no clear way to be certain on what the results of the actions will be. For example, there is no way to be sure that a severely impaired infant will not recover large to live a better life that what was predicted. However, acting morally doesnt mean acting omniscient. A reasonable effort must be made to get relevant data to predict the possible consequences of all actions involved.Another form of utilitarianism would be rule utilitarianism. This moral standard invoke that an action is right if it follows a specific rule that has been structured and validate while keeping the principle of utility in mind. A rule utilitarian would not concern themselves with the utility of specific or person cases, but would follow a set of particular rules. One would not have to go through the process of calculations involved in determining maximum utility, but a particular rule would... ...th Ross ethics.Even in the case involving Alice Nuvo and her not wanting treatment my moral intuition came into play. at a lower place most circumstances, my position is strictly to say that human life can never be allowed to pass if there is a reasonable intend of preserving it. However, there can be no rules for me to follow because I find exceptions to this, and the case of Alice Nuvo would be such a case. I ruled that her self-sufficiency surpasses any medical judgment. If she wants to be allowed to live out her life with her family and inescapably die, it should be her choice. Especially in a case such as this, I really have no way of check overing my actions and seeing what rules I followed or what past cases I referred to. Once again, my moral intuition lead me to define for her autonomy. However, moral intuition does not instantly occur when deciding on a case. There must be careful review of every aspect, action, and possible consequences before your moral intuition can decide upon anything. After reviewing my decision scenarios, and taking into account the beliefs of utilitarianism, Kants ethics, and Ross ethics, I. without a doubt, that I am a follower of Ross.